* fix: remove @calcom/web imports from packages/features to eliminate circular dependency - Migrate UserTableUser and MemberPermissions types to packages/features/users/types/user-table.ts - Migrate useGeo hook to packages/features/geo/GeoContext.tsx - Migrate buildLegacyRequest to packages/lib/buildLegacyCtx.ts - Migrate Calendar component to packages/features/calendars/weeklyview/components/ - Move test utilities (bookingScenario, fixtures) to packages/features/test/ - Update all imports in packages/features to use new locations - Add re-exports in apps/web for backward compatibility Co-Authored-By: benny@cal.com <sldisek783@gmail.com> * fix: delete original implementation files and fix type issues - Delete original calendar component files in apps/web (keep only re-export stubs) - Migrate OutOfOfficeInSlots to packages/features/bookings/components - Convert apps/web OutOfOfficeInSlots to re-export stub - Fix className vs class issue in Calendar.tsx - Fix @calcom/trpc import violation in user-table.ts by using structural type Co-Authored-By: benny@cal.com <sldisek783@gmail.com> * fix: add missing isGroup and contains fields to UserTableUser attributes type Co-Authored-By: benny@cal.com <sldisek783@gmail.com> * fix: update customRole type to match actual Prisma Role model Co-Authored-By: benny@cal.com <sldisek783@gmail.com> * fix build * fix * fix * cleanup weeklyview * fix * refactor to mv MemberPermissions to types package * add types dependency to features * fix * fix * fix * fix * fix * fix * rename * rename * migrate * migrate * migrate * fix * fix * fix * refactor: move test utilities from packages/features/test to tests/libs - Move bookingScenario utilities to tests/libs/bookingScenario - Move fixtures to tests/libs/fixtures - Update all imports in packages/features test files to use new location - Update all imports in apps/web test files to use new location - Eliminates duplication of test utilities between packages/features and apps/web Co-Authored-By: benny@cal.com <sldisek783@gmail.com> * fix: correct relative import paths for tests/libs in test files Co-Authored-By: benny@cal.com <sldisek783@gmail.com> * refactor: replace test utility implementations with re-exports to tests/libs Co-Authored-By: benny@cal.com <sldisek783@gmail.com> * fix: fix test import paths and move signup handler tests to apps/web Co-Authored-By: benny@cal.com <sldisek783@gmail.com> * fix: move buildLegacyCtx to packages/lib and restore handlers to packages/features - Move buildLegacyCtx from apps/web/lib to packages/lib to break circular dependency - Update apps/web/lib/buildLegacyCtx.ts to re-export from @calcom/lib - Restore signup handlers and tests to packages/features/auth/signup/handlers - Update handler imports to use @calcom/lib/buildLegacyCtx instead of @calcom/web/lib/buildLegacyCtx Co-Authored-By: benny@cal.com <sldisek783@gmail.com> * fix: update recurring-event.test.ts imports to use tests/libs path Co-Authored-By: benny@cal.com <sldisek783@gmail.com> * refactor: delete test re-export files and update imports to use tests/libs directly Co-Authored-By: benny@cal.com <sldisek783@gmail.com> * fix: update remaining test imports to use tests/libs directly Co-Authored-By: benny@cal.com <sldisek783@gmail.com> * fix: update handleRecurringEventBooking calls to match function signature (1 arg) Co-Authored-By: benny@cal.com <sldisek783@gmail.com> * remove * migrate tests * migrate tests * refactor: update test mock imports by removing and using async for mock creators. * fix type errors * fix: add type assertion for MockUser in p2002.test-suite.ts Co-Authored-By: benny@cal.com <sldisek783@gmail.com> * fix: restore locale import in compareReminderBodyToTemplate.test.ts using relative path Co-Authored-By: benny@cal.com <sldisek783@gmail.com> * feat: create @calcom/testing package and migrate tests from /tests directory - Created new @calcom/testing package in /packages/testing - Moved all files from /tests to /packages/testing - Updated all imports across the codebase to use @calcom/testing alias - Removed /tests directory at root level This allows other packages like @calcom/features and @calcom/web to import testing utilities using the @calcom/testing alias instead of relative paths. Co-Authored-By: benny@cal.com <sldisek783@gmail.com> * fix * fix * fix: add missing useBookings export to @calcom/atoms package Co-Authored-By: benny@cal.com <sldisek783@gmail.com> * fix: add missing useCalendarsBusyTimes and useConnectedCalendars exports to @calcom/atoms Co-Authored-By: benny@cal.com <sldisek783@gmail.com> * chore: add @calcom/testing as explicit devDependency to packages that use it Co-Authored-By: benny@cal.com <sldisek783@gmail.com> * refactor: move setupVitest.ts into @calcom/testing package Co-Authored-By: benny@cal.com <sldisek783@gmail.com> * fix * chore: add biome rules to restrict @calcom/testing imports Co-Authored-By: benny@cal.com <sldisek783@gmail.com> * fix * rename libs to lib * rename libs to lib * add rule * add rule * refactor: remove @calcom/features imports from @calcom/testing - Move mockPaymentSuccessWebhookFromStripe to fresh-booking.test.ts - Replace ProfileRepository.generateProfileUid() with uuidv4() - Clone Tracking type into @calcom/testing/src/lib/types.ts - Update imports in expects.ts and getMockRequestDataForBooking.ts - Move source files into src/ folder - Move CalendarManager mock to @calcom/features Co-Authored-By: benny@cal.com <sldisek783@gmail.com> * fix: add explicit exports for nested paths in @calcom/testing Co-Authored-By: benny@cal.com <sldisek783@gmail.com> * improve * improve * fix * fix * fix type checks * fix type checks * fix type checks * fix tests --------- Co-authored-by: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
375 lines
12 KiB
TypeScript
375 lines
12 KiB
TypeScript
import prismaMock from "@calcom/testing/lib/__mocks__/prismaMock";
|
|
|
|
import { describe, expect, it, vi, beforeEach } from "vitest";
|
|
|
|
import { OAUTH_ERROR_REASONS } from "@calcom/features/oauth/services/OAuthService";
|
|
|
|
import { TRPCError } from "@trpc/server";
|
|
|
|
import { generateAuthCodeHandler } from "./generateAuthCode.handler";
|
|
|
|
const mockUser = {
|
|
id: 1,
|
|
email: "test@example.com",
|
|
name: "Test User",
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const mockCtx = {
|
|
user: mockUser,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
describe("generateAuthCodeHandler", () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe("PUBLIC clients", () => {
|
|
const mockPublicClient = {
|
|
clientId: "public_client_123",
|
|
redirectUri: "https://app.example.com/callback",
|
|
name: "Test Public Client",
|
|
clientType: "PUBLIC" as const,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
it("should generate authorization code for PUBLIC client with valid PKCE", async () => {
|
|
prismaMock.oAuthClient.findFirst.mockResolvedValue(mockPublicClient);
|
|
prismaMock.accessCode.create.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: 1,
|
|
code: "test_auth_code",
|
|
clientId: "public_client_123",
|
|
userId: 1,
|
|
teamId: null,
|
|
codeChallenge: "test_challenge",
|
|
codeChallengeMethod: "S256",
|
|
expiresAt: new Date(),
|
|
createdAt: new Date(),
|
|
updatedAt: new Date(),
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const input = {
|
|
clientId: "public_client_123",
|
|
teamSlug: undefined,
|
|
codeChallenge: "test_challenge",
|
|
codeChallengeMethod: "S256" as const,
|
|
scopes: [],
|
|
redirectUri: "https://app.example.com/callback",
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const result = await generateAuthCodeHandler({ ctx: mockCtx, input });
|
|
|
|
expect(result.client).toEqual(mockPublicClient);
|
|
expect(result.authorizationCode).toBeDefined();
|
|
expect(prismaMock.accessCode.create).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
|
|
data: expect.objectContaining({
|
|
clientId: "public_client_123",
|
|
userId: 1,
|
|
teamId: undefined,
|
|
scopes: [],
|
|
codeChallenge: "test_challenge",
|
|
codeChallengeMethod: "S256",
|
|
}),
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("should reject PUBLIC client without code_challenge", async () => {
|
|
prismaMock.oAuthClient.findFirst.mockResolvedValue(mockPublicClient);
|
|
|
|
const input = {
|
|
clientId: "public_client_123",
|
|
scopes: [],
|
|
teamSlug: undefined,
|
|
codeChallenge: undefined,
|
|
codeChallengeMethod: "S256" as const,
|
|
redirectUri: "https://app.example.com/callback",
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
await expect(generateAuthCodeHandler({ ctx: mockCtx, input })).rejects.toThrow(
|
|
new TRPCError({
|
|
code: "BAD_REQUEST",
|
|
message: OAUTH_ERROR_REASONS["pkce_required"],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
expect(prismaMock.accessCode.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("should reject PUBLIC client without code_challenge_method", async () => {
|
|
prismaMock.oAuthClient.findFirst.mockResolvedValue(mockPublicClient);
|
|
|
|
const input = {
|
|
clientId: "public_client_123",
|
|
scopes: [],
|
|
teamSlug: undefined,
|
|
codeChallenge: "test_challenge",
|
|
codeChallengeMethod: undefined,
|
|
redirectUri: "https://app.example.com/callback",
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
await expect(generateAuthCodeHandler({ ctx: mockCtx, input })).rejects.toThrow(
|
|
new TRPCError({
|
|
code: "BAD_REQUEST",
|
|
message: OAUTH_ERROR_REASONS["invalid_code_challenge_method"],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
expect(prismaMock.accessCode.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("should reject PUBLIC client with invalid code_challenge_method", async () => {
|
|
prismaMock.oAuthClient.findFirst.mockResolvedValue(mockPublicClient);
|
|
|
|
// Test with MD5 (invalid method)
|
|
const inputMD5 = {
|
|
clientId: "public_client_123",
|
|
scopes: [],
|
|
teamSlug: undefined,
|
|
codeChallenge: "test_challenge",
|
|
codeChallengeMethod: "MD5",
|
|
redirectUri: "https://app.example.com/callback",
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
await expect(generateAuthCodeHandler({ ctx: mockCtx, input: inputMD5 })).rejects.toThrow(
|
|
new TRPCError({
|
|
code: "BAD_REQUEST",
|
|
message: OAUTH_ERROR_REASONS["invalid_code_challenge_method"],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Test with plain (should be rejected)
|
|
const inputPlain = {
|
|
clientId: "public_client_123",
|
|
scopes: [],
|
|
teamSlug: undefined,
|
|
codeChallenge: "test_challenge",
|
|
codeChallengeMethod: "plain",
|
|
redirectUri: "https://app.example.com/callback",
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
await expect(generateAuthCodeHandler({ ctx: mockCtx, input: inputPlain })).rejects.toThrow(
|
|
new TRPCError({
|
|
code: "BAD_REQUEST",
|
|
message: OAUTH_ERROR_REASONS["invalid_code_challenge_method"],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
expect(prismaMock.accessCode.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe("CONFIDENTIAL clients", () => {
|
|
const mockConfidentialClient = {
|
|
clientId: "confidential_client_456",
|
|
redirectUri: "https://app.example.com/callback",
|
|
name: "Test Confidential Client",
|
|
clientType: "CONFIDENTIAL" as const,
|
|
isTrusted: undefined,
|
|
logo: undefined,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
it("should generate authorization code for CONFIDENTIAL client without PKCE", async () => {
|
|
prismaMock.oAuthClient.findFirst.mockResolvedValue(mockConfidentialClient);
|
|
prismaMock.accessCode.create.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: 1,
|
|
code: "test_auth_code",
|
|
clientId: "confidential_client_456",
|
|
userId: 1,
|
|
teamId: null,
|
|
scopes: [],
|
|
codeChallenge: null,
|
|
codeChallengeMethod: null,
|
|
expiresAt: new Date(),
|
|
createdAt: new Date(),
|
|
updatedAt: new Date(),
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const input = {
|
|
clientId: "confidential_client_456",
|
|
scopes: [],
|
|
teamSlug: undefined,
|
|
codeChallenge: undefined,
|
|
codeChallengeMethod: undefined,
|
|
redirectUri: "https://app.example.com/callback",
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const result = await generateAuthCodeHandler({ ctx: mockCtx, input });
|
|
|
|
expect(result.client).toEqual(mockConfidentialClient);
|
|
expect(result.authorizationCode).toBeDefined();
|
|
expect(prismaMock.accessCode.create).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
|
|
data: expect.objectContaining({
|
|
clientId: "confidential_client_456",
|
|
userId: 1,
|
|
teamId: undefined,
|
|
scopes: [],
|
|
codeChallenge: undefined,
|
|
codeChallengeMethod: undefined,
|
|
}),
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("should accept CONFIDENTIAL client with valid PKCE for enhanced security", async () => {
|
|
prismaMock.oAuthClient.findFirst.mockResolvedValue(mockConfidentialClient);
|
|
prismaMock.accessCode.create.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: 1,
|
|
code: "test_auth_code",
|
|
clientId: "confidential_client_456",
|
|
userId: 1,
|
|
teamId: null,
|
|
scopes: [],
|
|
expiresAt: new Date(),
|
|
codeChallenge: "test_challenge",
|
|
codeChallengeMethod: "S256",
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
const input = {
|
|
clientId: "confidential_client_456",
|
|
scopes: [],
|
|
teamSlug: undefined,
|
|
codeChallenge: "test_challenge",
|
|
codeChallengeMethod: "S256" as const,
|
|
redirectUri: "https://app.example.com/callback",
|
|
state: "1234",
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
const result = await generateAuthCodeHandler({ ctx: mockCtx, input });
|
|
|
|
expect(result.authorizationCode).toBeDefined();
|
|
expect(result.redirectUrl).toEqual(
|
|
`https://app.example.com/callback?code=${result.authorizationCode}&state=1234`
|
|
);
|
|
expect(prismaMock.accessCode.create).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
|
|
data: {
|
|
code: expect.any(String),
|
|
clientId: "confidential_client_456",
|
|
userId: 1,
|
|
teamId: undefined,
|
|
scopes: [],
|
|
expiresAt: expect.any(Date),
|
|
codeChallenge: "test_challenge",
|
|
codeChallengeMethod: "S256",
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("should reject CONFIDENTIAL client with code_challenge but missing method", async () => {
|
|
prismaMock.oAuthClient.findFirst.mockResolvedValue(mockConfidentialClient);
|
|
|
|
const input = {
|
|
clientId: "confidential_client_456",
|
|
scopes: [],
|
|
teamSlug: undefined,
|
|
codeChallenge: "test_challenge",
|
|
codeChallengeMethod: undefined,
|
|
redirectUri: "https://app.example.com/callback",
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
await expect(generateAuthCodeHandler({ ctx: mockCtx, input })).rejects.toThrow(
|
|
new TRPCError({
|
|
code: "BAD_REQUEST",
|
|
message: OAUTH_ERROR_REASONS["invalid_code_challenge_method"],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
expect(prismaMock.accessCode.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe("Client validation", () => {
|
|
it("should reject invalid client ID", async () => {
|
|
prismaMock.oAuthClient.findFirst.mockResolvedValue(null);
|
|
|
|
const input = {
|
|
clientId: "invalid_client",
|
|
scopes: [],
|
|
teamSlug: undefined,
|
|
codeChallenge: undefined,
|
|
codeChallengeMethod: undefined,
|
|
redirectUri: "https://app.example.com/callback",
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
await expect(generateAuthCodeHandler({ ctx: mockCtx, input })).rejects.toThrow(
|
|
new TRPCError({
|
|
code: "UNAUTHORIZED",
|
|
message: OAUTH_ERROR_REASONS["client_not_found"],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
expect(prismaMock.accessCode.create).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("should accept only supported PKCE methods", async () => {
|
|
const mockPublicClient = {
|
|
clientId: "public_client_123",
|
|
redirectUri: "https://app.example.com/callback",
|
|
name: "Test Public Client",
|
|
clientType: "PUBLIC" as const,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
prismaMock.oAuthClient.findFirst.mockResolvedValue(mockPublicClient);
|
|
prismaMock.accessCode.create.mockResolvedValue({
|
|
id: 1,
|
|
code: "test_auth_code",
|
|
clientId: "public_client_123",
|
|
userId: 1,
|
|
teamId: null,
|
|
scopes: [],
|
|
codeChallenge: "test_challenge",
|
|
codeChallengeMethod: "S256",
|
|
expiresAt: new Date(),
|
|
createdAt: new Date(),
|
|
updatedAt: new Date(),
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Test S256
|
|
const inputS256 = {
|
|
clientId: "public_client_123",
|
|
redirectUri: "https://app.example.com/callback",
|
|
scopes: [],
|
|
teamSlug: undefined,
|
|
codeChallenge: "test_challenge",
|
|
codeChallengeMethod: "S256" as const,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
await expect(generateAuthCodeHandler({ ctx: mockCtx, input: inputS256 })).resolves.toBeDefined();
|
|
|
|
// Reset mocks for next test
|
|
vi.clearAllMocks();
|
|
prismaMock.oAuthClient.findFirst.mockResolvedValue(mockPublicClient);
|
|
|
|
// Test invalid method
|
|
const inputInvalid = {
|
|
clientId: "public_client_123",
|
|
redirectUri: "https://app.example.com/callback",
|
|
scopes: [],
|
|
teamSlug: undefined,
|
|
codeChallenge: "test_challenge",
|
|
codeChallengeMethod: "SHA1",
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
await expect(generateAuthCodeHandler({ ctx: mockCtx, input: inputInvalid })).rejects.toThrow(
|
|
new TRPCError({
|
|
code: "BAD_REQUEST",
|
|
message: OAUTH_ERROR_REASONS["invalid_code_challenge_method"],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Test plain method (should be rejected)
|
|
const inputPlain = {
|
|
clientId: "public_client_123",
|
|
scopes: [],
|
|
teamSlug: undefined,
|
|
codeChallenge: "test_challenge",
|
|
codeChallengeMethod: "plain",
|
|
redirectUri: "https://app.example.com/callback",
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
await expect(generateAuthCodeHandler({ ctx: mockCtx, input: inputPlain })).rejects.toThrow(
|
|
new TRPCError({
|
|
code: "BAD_REQUEST",
|
|
message: OAUTH_ERROR_REASONS["invalid_code_challenge_method"],
|
|
})
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
});
|