docs: add repository method conventions to knowledge base (#24443)
- Add comprehensive repository method naming conventions - Include examples for method naming patterns - Document separation of concerns between repositories and services - Emphasize reusability and generic method naming Co-authored-by: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Devin AI
parent
37cec89bf6
commit
7af46cc7ab
@@ -306,6 +306,224 @@ import { Button } from "@calcom/ui/components/button";
|
||||
- **Tests**: Same as source file + `.test.ts` or `.spec.ts`
|
||||
- **Avoid**: Dot-suffixes like `.service.ts`, `.repository.ts` (except for tests, types, specs)
|
||||
|
||||
## Repository Method Conventions
|
||||
|
||||
Repositories should follow consistent naming and design patterns to promote reusability and maintainability.
|
||||
|
||||
### Method Naming Rules
|
||||
|
||||
**1. Don't include the repository's entity name in method names**
|
||||
|
||||
Method names should be concise and avoid redundancy since the repository class name already indicates the entity type.
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
// ✅ Good - Concise method names
|
||||
class BookingRepository {
|
||||
findById(id: string) { ... }
|
||||
findByUserId(userId: string) { ... }
|
||||
create(data: BookingCreateInput) { ... }
|
||||
delete(id: string) { ... }
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ❌ Bad - Redundant entity name in methods
|
||||
class BookingRepository {
|
||||
findBookingById(id: string) { ... }
|
||||
findBookingByUserId(userId: string) { ... }
|
||||
createBooking(data: BookingCreateInput) { ... }
|
||||
deleteBooking(id: string) { ... }
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**2. Use `include` or similar keywords for methods that fetch relational data**
|
||||
|
||||
When a method retrieves additional related entities, make this explicit in the method name using keywords like `include`, `with`, or `andRelations`.
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
// ✅ Good - Clear indication of included relations
|
||||
class EventTypeRepository {
|
||||
findById(id: string) {
|
||||
return prisma.eventType.findUnique({
|
||||
where: { id },
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
findByIdIncludeHosts(id: string) {
|
||||
return prisma.eventType.findUnique({
|
||||
where: { id },
|
||||
include: {
|
||||
hosts: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
findByIdIncludeHostsAndSchedule(id: string) {
|
||||
return prisma.eventType.findUnique({
|
||||
where: { id },
|
||||
include: {
|
||||
hosts: true,
|
||||
schedule: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ❌ Bad - Unclear what data is included
|
||||
class EventTypeRepository {
|
||||
findById(id: string) {
|
||||
return prisma.eventType.findUnique({
|
||||
where: { id },
|
||||
include: {
|
||||
hosts: true,
|
||||
schedule: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
findByIdForReporting(id: string) {
|
||||
return prisma.eventType.findUnique({
|
||||
where: { id },
|
||||
include: {
|
||||
hosts: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**3. Keep methods generic and reusable - avoid use-case-specific names**
|
||||
|
||||
Repository methods should be general-purpose and describe what data they return, not how or where it's used. This promotes code reuse across different features.
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
// ✅ Good - Generic, reusable methods
|
||||
class BookingRepository {
|
||||
findByUserIdIncludeAttendees(userId: string) {
|
||||
return prisma.booking.findMany({
|
||||
where: { userId },
|
||||
include: {
|
||||
attendees: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
findByDateRangeIncludeEventType(startDate: Date, endDate: Date) {
|
||||
return prisma.booking.findMany({
|
||||
where: {
|
||||
startTime: { gte: startDate },
|
||||
endTime: { lte: endDate },
|
||||
},
|
||||
include: {
|
||||
eventType: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ❌ Bad - Use-case-specific method names
|
||||
class BookingRepository {
|
||||
findBookingsForReporting(userId: string) {
|
||||
return prisma.booking.findMany({
|
||||
where: { userId },
|
||||
include: {
|
||||
attendees: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
findBookingsForDashboard(startDate: Date, endDate: Date) {
|
||||
return prisma.booking.findMany({
|
||||
where: {
|
||||
startTime: { gte: startDate },
|
||||
endTime: { lte: endDate },
|
||||
},
|
||||
include: {
|
||||
eventType: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**4. No business logic in repositories**
|
||||
|
||||
Repositories should only handle data access. Business logic, validations, and complex transformations belong in the Service layer.
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
// ✅ Good - Repository only handles data access
|
||||
class BookingRepository {
|
||||
findByIdIncludeAttendees(id: string) {
|
||||
return prisma.booking.findUnique({
|
||||
where: { id },
|
||||
include: {
|
||||
attendees: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
updateStatus(id: string, status: BookingStatus) {
|
||||
return prisma.booking.update({
|
||||
where: { id },
|
||||
data: { status },
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
class BookingService {
|
||||
async confirmBooking(bookingId: string) {
|
||||
const booking = await this.bookingRepository.findByIdIncludeAttendees(bookingId);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!booking) {
|
||||
throw new Error("Booking not found");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (booking.status !== "PENDING") {
|
||||
throw new Error("Only pending bookings can be confirmed");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Business logic: send confirmation emails
|
||||
await this.emailService.sendConfirmationToAttendees(booking.attendees);
|
||||
|
||||
// Update status through repository
|
||||
return this.bookingRepository.updateStatus(bookingId, "CONFIRMED");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ❌ Bad - Business logic in repository
|
||||
class BookingRepository {
|
||||
async confirmBooking(bookingId: string) {
|
||||
const booking = await prisma.booking.findUnique({
|
||||
where: { id: bookingId },
|
||||
include: {
|
||||
attendees: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
if (!booking) {
|
||||
throw new Error("Booking not found");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (booking.status !== "PENDING") {
|
||||
throw new Error("Only pending bookings can be confirmed");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ❌ Business logic shouldn't be here
|
||||
await sendEmailToAttendees(booking.attendees);
|
||||
|
||||
return prisma.booking.update({
|
||||
where: { id: bookingId },
|
||||
data: { status: "CONFIRMED" },
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Summary
|
||||
|
||||
- Method names should be concise: `findById` not `findBookingById`
|
||||
- Use `include`/`with` keywords when fetching relations: `findByIdIncludeHosts`
|
||||
- Keep methods generic and reusable: `findByUserIdIncludeAttendees` not `findBookingsForReporting`
|
||||
- No business logic in repositories - that belongs in Services
|
||||
|
||||
## When using Day.js
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user