docs: add repository method conventions to knowledge base (#24443)

- Add comprehensive repository method naming conventions
- Include examples for method naming patterns
- Document separation of concerns between repositories and services
- Emphasize reusability and generic method naming

Co-authored-by: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
Hariom Balhara
2025-10-15 13:44:06 +00:00
committed by GitHub
co-authored by Devin AI
parent 37cec89bf6
commit 7af46cc7ab
+218
View File
@@ -306,6 +306,224 @@ import { Button } from "@calcom/ui/components/button";
- **Tests**: Same as source file + `.test.ts` or `.spec.ts`
- **Avoid**: Dot-suffixes like `.service.ts`, `.repository.ts` (except for tests, types, specs)
## Repository Method Conventions
Repositories should follow consistent naming and design patterns to promote reusability and maintainability.
### Method Naming Rules
**1. Don't include the repository's entity name in method names**
Method names should be concise and avoid redundancy since the repository class name already indicates the entity type.
```typescript
// ✅ Good - Concise method names
class BookingRepository {
findById(id: string) { ... }
findByUserId(userId: string) { ... }
create(data: BookingCreateInput) { ... }
delete(id: string) { ... }
}
// ❌ Bad - Redundant entity name in methods
class BookingRepository {
findBookingById(id: string) { ... }
findBookingByUserId(userId: string) { ... }
createBooking(data: BookingCreateInput) { ... }
deleteBooking(id: string) { ... }
}
```
**2. Use `include` or similar keywords for methods that fetch relational data**
When a method retrieves additional related entities, make this explicit in the method name using keywords like `include`, `with`, or `andRelations`.
```typescript
// ✅ Good - Clear indication of included relations
class EventTypeRepository {
findById(id: string) {
return prisma.eventType.findUnique({
where: { id },
});
}
findByIdIncludeHosts(id: string) {
return prisma.eventType.findUnique({
where: { id },
include: {
hosts: true,
},
});
}
findByIdIncludeHostsAndSchedule(id: string) {
return prisma.eventType.findUnique({
where: { id },
include: {
hosts: true,
schedule: true,
},
});
}
}
// ❌ Bad - Unclear what data is included
class EventTypeRepository {
findById(id: string) {
return prisma.eventType.findUnique({
where: { id },
include: {
hosts: true,
schedule: true,
},
});
}
findByIdForReporting(id: string) {
return prisma.eventType.findUnique({
where: { id },
include: {
hosts: true,
},
});
}
}
```
**3. Keep methods generic and reusable - avoid use-case-specific names**
Repository methods should be general-purpose and describe what data they return, not how or where it's used. This promotes code reuse across different features.
```typescript
// ✅ Good - Generic, reusable methods
class BookingRepository {
findByUserIdIncludeAttendees(userId: string) {
return prisma.booking.findMany({
where: { userId },
include: {
attendees: true,
},
});
}
findByDateRangeIncludeEventType(startDate: Date, endDate: Date) {
return prisma.booking.findMany({
where: {
startTime: { gte: startDate },
endTime: { lte: endDate },
},
include: {
eventType: true,
},
});
}
}
// ❌ Bad - Use-case-specific method names
class BookingRepository {
findBookingsForReporting(userId: string) {
return prisma.booking.findMany({
where: { userId },
include: {
attendees: true,
},
});
}
findBookingsForDashboard(startDate: Date, endDate: Date) {
return prisma.booking.findMany({
where: {
startTime: { gte: startDate },
endTime: { lte: endDate },
},
include: {
eventType: true,
},
});
}
}
```
**4. No business logic in repositories**
Repositories should only handle data access. Business logic, validations, and complex transformations belong in the Service layer.
```typescript
// ✅ Good - Repository only handles data access
class BookingRepository {
findByIdIncludeAttendees(id: string) {
return prisma.booking.findUnique({
where: { id },
include: {
attendees: true,
},
});
}
updateStatus(id: string, status: BookingStatus) {
return prisma.booking.update({
where: { id },
data: { status },
});
}
}
class BookingService {
async confirmBooking(bookingId: string) {
const booking = await this.bookingRepository.findByIdIncludeAttendees(bookingId);
if (!booking) {
throw new Error("Booking not found");
}
if (booking.status !== "PENDING") {
throw new Error("Only pending bookings can be confirmed");
}
// Business logic: send confirmation emails
await this.emailService.sendConfirmationToAttendees(booking.attendees);
// Update status through repository
return this.bookingRepository.updateStatus(bookingId, "CONFIRMED");
}
}
// ❌ Bad - Business logic in repository
class BookingRepository {
async confirmBooking(bookingId: string) {
const booking = await prisma.booking.findUnique({
where: { id: bookingId },
include: {
attendees: true,
},
});
if (!booking) {
throw new Error("Booking not found");
}
if (booking.status !== "PENDING") {
throw new Error("Only pending bookings can be confirmed");
}
// ❌ Business logic shouldn't be here
await sendEmailToAttendees(booking.attendees);
return prisma.booking.update({
where: { id: bookingId },
data: { status: "CONFIRMED" },
});
}
}
```
### Summary
- Method names should be concise: `findById` not `findBookingById`
- Use `include`/`with` keywords when fetching relations: `findByIdIncludeHosts`
- Keep methods generic and reusable: `findByUserIdIncludeAttendees` not `findBookingsForReporting`
- No business logic in repositories - that belongs in Services
## When using Day.js
```typescript