refactor: replace isTeamAdminOrOwner with PBAC team.listMembers permission (#24006)

* refactor: replace isTeamAdminOrOwner with PBAC team.listMembers permission

- Add canListMembers prop to BookingsProps interface
- Implement server-side permission check using PermissionCheckService
- Handle organization vs team context as specified
- Use ADMIN/OWNER fallback roles for backward compatibility
- Replace user?.isTeamAdminOrOwner check in bookings column filter
- Fix React Hook dependency arrays for ESLint compliance

Co-Authored-By: eunjae@cal.com <hey@eunjae.dev>

* refactor: wrap canListMembers in permissions object and simplify server logic

- Wrap canListMembers in permissions object for future extensibility
- Simplify server-side logic to only use getTeamIdsWithPermission
- Remove unused imports (prisma, MembershipRole)
- Address user feedback on PR #24006

Co-Authored-By: eunjae@cal.com <hey@eunjae.dev>

* docs: add comment explaining canListMembers UI logic

- Clarify that teamIdsWithPermission.length > 0 check is for UI purposes
- Actual accurate filtering happens server-side for filter values

Co-Authored-By: eunjae@cal.com <hey@eunjae.dev>

* feat: add e2e test for member filter visibility

- Verify that users with the MEMBER role cannot see the member filter
- Test creates team with ADMIN and MEMBER users
- Confirms UI correctly reflects PBAC permissions
- Address user feedback on PR #24006

Co-Authored-By: eunjae@cal.com <hey@eunjae.dev>

* fix: correct e2e test team member creation pattern

- Replace invalid teamId property with hasTeam and teammates pattern
- Fix TypeScript error in booking-filters.e2e.ts
- Resolve CI type check failure

Co-Authored-By: eunjae@cal.com <hey@eunjae.dev>

* fix e2e test

* remove booking.read permission from member

* add guide

* update

* resource scope

* fix markdown

* update usage

* update guide

---------

Co-authored-by: Devin AI <158243242+devin-ai-integration[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: sean-brydon <55134778+sean-brydon@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
authored and GitHub committed 2025-09-26 06:26:20 -03:00
1 parent 689150d78a
commit a4dbb1a90b
5 files changed
+318 -27

No files matched your search

@@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ import { redirect } from "next/navigation";
import { z } from "zod";
import { getServerSession } from "@calcom/features/auth/lib/getServerSession";
import { PermissionCheckService } from "@calcom/features/pbac/services/permission-check.service";
import { MembershipRole } from "@calcom/prisma/enums";
import { buildLegacyRequest } from "@lib/buildLegacyCtx";
@@ -33,9 +35,30 @@ const Page = async ({ params }: PageProps) => {
const t = await getTranslate();
const session = await getServerSession({ req: buildLegacyRequest(await headers(), await cookies()) });
let canReadOthersBookings = false;
if (session?.user?.id) {
const permissionService = new PermissionCheckService();
const userId = session.user.id;
const teamIdsWithPermission = await permissionService.getTeamIdsWithPermission({
userId,
permission: "booking.read",
fallbackRoles: [MembershipRole.OWNER, MembershipRole.ADMIN],
});
// We check if teamIdsWithPermission.length > 0.
// While this may not be entirely accurate, it's acceptable
// because we perform a thorough validation on the server side for the actual filter values.
// This variable is primarily for UI purposes.
canReadOthersBookings = teamIdsWithPermission.length > 0;
}
return (
<ShellMainAppDir heading={t("bookings")} subtitle={t("bookings_description")}>
<BookingsList status={parsed.data.status} userId={session?.user?.id} />
<BookingsList
status={parsed.data.status}
userId={session?.user?.id}
permissions={{ canReadOthersBookings }}
/>
</ShellMainAppDir>
);
};
@@ -57,6 +57,9 @@ const descriptionByStatus: Record<BookingListingStatus, string> = {
type BookingsProps = {
status: (typeof validStatuses)[number];
userId?: number;
permissions: {
canReadOthersBookings: boolean;
};
};
function useSystemSegments(userId?: number) {
@@ -111,7 +114,7 @@ type RowData =
type: "today" | "next";
};
function BookingsContent({ status }: BookingsProps) {
function BookingsContent({ status, permissions }: BookingsProps) {
const { t } = useLocale();
const user = useMeQuery().data;
const tableContainerRef = useRef<HTMLDivElement>(null);
@@ -154,7 +157,7 @@ function BookingsContent({ status }: BookingsProps) {
href: queryString ? `${tabConfig.path}?${queryString}` : tabConfig.path,
"data-testid": tabConfig["data-testid"],
}));
}, [searchParams?.toString()]);
}, [searchParams]);
const eventTypeIds = useFilterValue("eventTypeId", ZMultiSelectFilterValue)?.data as number[] | undefined;
const teamIds = useFilterValue("teamId", ZMultiSelectFilterValue)?.data as number[] | undefined;
@@ -215,7 +218,7 @@ function BookingsContent({ status }: BookingsProps) {
columnHelper.accessor((row) => row.type === "data" && row.booking.user?.id, {
id: "userId",
header: t("member"),
enableColumnFilter: user?.isTeamAdminOrOwner ?? false,
enableColumnFilter: permissions.canReadOthersBookings,
enableSorting: false,
cell: () => null,
meta: {
@@ -314,7 +317,7 @@ function BookingsContent({ status }: BookingsProps) {
},
}),
];
}, [user, status, t]);
}, [user, status, t, permissions.canReadOthersBookings]);
const isEmpty = useMemo(() => !query.data?.bookings.length, [query.data]);
@@ -352,7 +355,7 @@ function BookingsContent({ status }: BookingsProps) {
isToday: false,
})) || []
);
}, [query.data]);
}, [query.data, status, user?.timeZone]);
const bookingsToday = useMemo<RowData[]>(() => {
return (
@@ -371,7 +374,7 @@ function BookingsContent({ status }: BookingsProps) {
isToday: true,
})) ?? []
);
}, [query.data]);
}, [query.data, user?.timeZone]);
const finalData = useMemo<RowData[]>(() => {
if (status !== "upcoming") {
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
import { expect } from "@playwright/test";
import { test } from "./lib/fixtures";
test.describe.configure({ mode: "parallel" });
test.afterEach(({ users }) => users.deleteAll());
test.describe("Booking Filters", () => {
test("Member role should not see the member filter", async ({ page, users }) => {
const teamMateName = "team mate 1";
await users.create(undefined, {
hasTeam: true,
isOrg: true,
teammates: [{ name: teamMateName }],
});
const allUsers = await users.get();
const memberUser = allUsers.find((user) => user.name === teamMateName);
// eslint-disable-next-line playwright/no-conditional-in-test
if (!memberUser) {
throw new Error("user should exist");
}
await memberUser.apiLogin();
const bookingsGetResponse = page.waitForResponse((response) =>
/\/api\/trpc\/bookings\/get.*/.test(response.url())
);
await page.goto(`/bookings/upcoming`, { waitUntil: "domcontentloaded" });
await bookingsGetResponse;
await page.locator('[data-testid="add-filter-button"]').click();
await expect(page.locator('[data-testid="add-filter-item-userId"]')).toBeHidden();
});
test("Admin role should see the member filter", async ({ page, users }) => {
const owner = await users.create(undefined, {
hasTeam: true,
isOrg: true,
});
await owner.apiLogin();
const bookingsGetResponse = page.waitForResponse((response) =>
/\/api\/trpc\/bookings\/get.*/.test(response.url())
);
await page.goto(`/bookings/upcoming`, { waitUntil: "domcontentloaded" });
await bookingsGetResponse;
await page.locator('[data-testid="add-filter-button"]').click();
await expect(page.locator('[data-testid="add-filter-item-userId"]')).toBeVisible();
});
});
+232 -20
View File
@@ -1,10 +1,13 @@
# PBAC Refactoring Guide
Quick guide for refactoring Cal.com handlers to use Permission-Based Access Control (PBAC) instead of membership-based queries.
Quick guide for refactoring Cal.com to use Permission-Based Access Control (PBAC) instead of role-based checks and membership queries.
## Core Pattern: Team Filtering with PBAC
## Core Patterns
### 1. Team Filtering with PBAC (API/tRPC handlers)
**Before (Membership-based)**:
```typescript
const teamsToQuery = (
await prisma.membership.findMany({
@@ -24,63 +27,272 @@ const teamsToQuery = (
```
**After (PBAC-based)**:
```typescript
import { PermissionCheckService } from "@calcom/features/pbac/services/permission-check.service";
import { MembershipRole } from "@calcom/prisma/enums";
const permissionCheckService = new PermissionCheckService();
const teamsToQuery = await permissionCheckService.getTeamIdsWithPermission(
ctx.user.id,
"team.listMembers"
);
const teamsToQuery = await permissionCheckService.getTeamIdsWithPermission({
userId: ctx.user.id,
permission: "team.listMembers",
fallbackRoles: [MembershipRole.ADMIN, MembershipRole.OWNER],
});
```
### 2. UI Permission Checks (React components)
**Before (Role-based)**:
```typescript
// Client-side role check with role-based variable name
const isTeamAdminOrOwner = user?.isTeamAdminOrOwner ?? false;
const canSeeMembers = isTeamAdminOrOwner;
```
**After (PBAC-based)**:
```typescript
// Server-side permission check in page/layout
import { MembershipRole } from "@calcom/prisma/enums";
const permissionCheckService = new PermissionCheckService();
const teamIdsWithPermission = await permissionCheckService.getTeamIdsWithPermission({
userId: session.user.id,
permission: "team.listMembers",
fallbackRoles: [MembershipRole.ADMIN, MembershipRole.OWNER],
});
const permissions = {
canListMembers: teamIdsWithPermission.length > 0,
};
// Pass to component
<MyComponent permissions={permissions} />;
```
## Key Points
### 1. Use Direct Permission Strings
- Use `"team.listMembers"` directly instead of `PermissionMapper.toPermissionString()`
- Simpler and more readable
### 2. No Fallback Logic Needed
- `getTeamIdsWithPermission()` handles errors internally
- Returns empty array `[]` when user has no permissions (this is legitimate)
- Don't assume empty array means PBAC failure
### 3. Common Team Permissions
### 3. Server-Side Permission Checking
- **Move permission checks from client to server** - crucial for security
- Check permissions in page/layout components, not in UI components
- Pass permission results as props to maintain separation of concerns
### 4. Permissions Object Pattern
- Wrap permission booleans in a `permissions` object for extensibility
- Use descriptive names like `canListMembers` instead of raw permission strings
- Makes it easy to add more permissions later
### 5. Permission-Based Variable Naming
- **Use permission-specific names** like `canListMembers` instead of role-based names like `isTeamAdminOrOwner`
- Follow the pattern: `can[Action][Resource]` (e.g., `canListMembers`, `canUpdateTeam`, `canInviteUsers`)
- Makes code more readable and aligns with the actual permission being checked
- Easier to understand what specific action is being permitted
### 6. Team vs Personal Resources
**Rule**: Use `teamId` to determine if permission checks are needed:
- `teamId` present → Team resource → Check permissions
- `teamId` null/undefined → Personal resource → Check ownership only
**Example**: `booking.read` permission
- ✅ Has permission: Can read **all team members' bookings**
- ❌ No permission: Can **still read own bookings**, just not others'
```typescript
if (resource.teamId) {
// Team resource - check permissions
const hasPermission = await permissionService.hasPermission(userId, "resource.read", resource.teamId);
if (!hasPermission) throw new ForbiddenError();
} else {
// Personal resource - check ownership only
if (resource.userId !== currentUserId) throw new ForbiddenError();
}
```
### 7. Common Team Permissions
- `"booking.read"` - Read all team members' bookings (not just own)
- `"team.listMembers"` - List team members
- `"team.read"` - View team details
- `"team.read"` - View team details
- `"team.update"` - Edit team settings
- `"team.invite"` - Invite members
- `"team.remove"` - Remove members
## Step-by-Step Refactoring
1. **Add import**:
```typescript
import { PermissionCheckService } from "@calcom/features/pbac/services/permission-check.service";
```
### For API/tRPC Handlers
1. **Add imports**:
```typescript
import { PermissionCheckService } from "@calcom/features/pbac/services/permission-check.service";
import { MembershipRole } from "@calcom/prisma/enums";
```
2. **Replace membership query**:
```typescript
const permissionCheckService = new PermissionCheckService();
const teamsToQuery = await permissionCheckService.getTeamIdsWithPermission(
ctx.user.id,
"team.listMembers"
);
```
```typescript
const permissionCheckService = new PermissionCheckService();
const teamsToQuery = await permissionCheckService.getTeamIdsWithPermission({
userId: ctx.user.id,
permission: "team.listMembers",
fallbackRoles: [MembershipRole.ADMIN, MembershipRole.OWNER],
});
```
3. **Keep existing privacy checks** - PBAC doesn't replace organization-level privacy logic
## Example: listSimpleMembers.handler.ts
### For UI Components
1. **Move permission check to server** (page/layout component):
```typescript
import { PermissionCheckService } from "@calcom/features/pbac/services/permission-check.service";
import { MembershipRole } from "@calcom/prisma/enums";
// In your page component
const permissionCheckService = new PermissionCheckService();
const teamIdsWithPermission = await permissionCheckService.getTeamIdsWithPermission({
userId: session.user.id,
permission: "team.listMembers",
fallbackRoles: [MembershipRole.ADMIN, MembershipRole.OWNER],
});
const permissions = {
canListMembers: teamIdsWithPermission.length > 0, // Permission-specific name
};
```
2. **Pass permissions as props**:
```typescript
<BookingsContent permissions={permissions} />
```
3. **Update component interface**:
```typescript
interface BookingsProps {
permissions: {
canListMembers: boolean;
};
}
```
4. **Replace role checks in component**:
```typescript
// Replace: const isTeamAdminOrOwner = user?.isTeamAdminOrOwner ?? false
// With: const canListMembers = permissions.canListMembers
// Use permission-specific variable names throughout your component
```
## Examples
### API Handler: listSimpleMembers.handler.ts
**What changed**:
- Replaced 17 lines of membership query with 2 lines of PBAC
- Removed unnecessary imports and fallback logic
- Used direct permission string `"team.listMembers"`
**Result**: Cleaner, more maintainable code that respects fine-grained permissions.
### UI Component: Bookings Page
**What changed** (from PR #24006):
- Moved permission check from client (`user?.isTeamAdminOrOwner`) to server
- Added `permissions` prop with `canListMembers` boolean
- Used `teamIdsWithPermission.length > 0` pattern for UI control
- Added E2E test to verify member filter visibility
**Before**:
```typescript
// In component - role-based variable name
const isTeamAdminOrOwner = user?.isTeamAdminOrOwner ?? false;
const canSeeMembers = isTeamAdminOrOwner;
```
**After**:
```typescript
// In page component (server-side)
const permissions = {
canListMembers: teamIdsWithPermission.length > 0,
};
// In UI component - permission-specific variable name
const canListMembers = permissions.canListMembers;
const canSeeMembers = canListMembers; // Use permission-specific name
```
**Result**: Secure server-side permission checking with clean UI separation.
## Verification
### For All Refactoring
- Run `yarn type-check:ci --force`
- Ensure existing privacy checks remain intact
- Test with users who have different permission levels
### For UI Refactoring
- Add E2E tests to verify UI element visibility based on permissions
- Test with different user roles (ADMIN, OWNER, MEMBER)
- Verify that permission checks happen server-side, not client-side
- Confirm that UI elements are properly hidden/shown based on `permissions` props
### Common Pitfalls
- **Don't check permissions client-side** - always do it server-side for security
- **Don't assume empty array means failure** - it's valid when user has no permissions
- **Remember to update TypeScript interfaces** when adding new permission props
- **Don't use role-based variable names** - use permission-specific names instead
## Variable Naming Best Practices
### ✅ Good: Permission-Specific Names
```typescript
const canListMembers = permissions.canListMembers;
const canUpdateTeam = permissions.canUpdateTeam;
const canInviteUsers = permissions.canInviteUsers;
const canDeleteBookings = permissions.canDeleteBookings;
```
### ❌ Bad: Role-Based Names
```typescript
const isTeamAdminOrOwner = user?.isTeamAdminOrOwner;
const isAdmin = user?.role === "ADMIN";
const hasPermission = user?.isTeamAdminOrOwner;
```
### Naming Convention
- Use the pattern: `can[Action][Resource]`
- Examples: `canListMembers`, `canUpdateTeam`, `canInviteUsers`
- Makes code self-documenting and easier to understand
- Aligns variable names with the actual permissions being checked
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
-- Do not allow members to read others' bookings in the team
delete from "RolePermission" where "roleId" = 'member_role' and resource = 'booking' and action = 'read';